<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Propellerhead Reason 4 Sneak Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/</link>
	<description>Electronic music news, synthesizers, reviews and more!</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dizi izle</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-127270</link>
		<dc:creator>dizi izle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-127270</guid>
		<description>thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8bit chip</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-126152</link>
		<dc:creator>8bit chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-126152</guid>
		<description>reason 4 really sucks!!!

i was messing with reason for many years and i was a huge fun of the program until the release of version 4 which made me realize many obvious things which i didnt want to admit in the first place.

reason came out in 2000, and although it wasnt designed to support vst technology, almost every user in propellerhead forum was asking desperately for vst support.
its quite obvious why reason users wanted that. from 2000 till now vst technology became very powerful and cutting edge technology in music industry. all reason synths and effects sound quite weak comparing to what is out today!

but propellerheads keep ignoring what their users want and keep adding some good or less good devises to make reason more update or appealing.

whats the point to add mastering suite when there are extremely good mastering effects out there with precise controls like izotopes ozone or waves ssl among many others?

other users need more complex delays or filters or gates or synths or guitar amps or audio recording, etc.
So what is going to be? wait 10 more years to see these features as updates in reason? all these problems should have been solved by adding vst technology.

some they may say that you can have all these features by rewire, but composing and arranging music in 2 applications simultaneously is quite frustrating!

from version 3 to 4, we’ve waited more than a year to see props destroying the sequencer. this update found some supporters but many users also found the new sequencer quite frustrating and slowing down their work flow (including me). the old tested sequencer was actually the power of reason! its simplicity and directness was the power that attracted thousands of users.
now that magic is gone! 

in version 4 props added thor and thay’ve announced it as the ultimate synthesizer but it still sounds pretty weak compare to what vsti's are out today! even though, you have to know really good programming to get rich sounds in thor.

so… after messing and adoring reason for 8 years i finally realize that reason is never going to be a pro music application.
for hobbyists and music learning schools is an awesome program, but for pro music making still sound weak and limited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reason 4 really sucks!!!</p>
<p>i was messing with reason for many years and i was a huge fun of the program until the release of version 4 which made me realize many obvious things which i didnt want to admit in the first place.</p>
<p>reason came out in 2000, and although it wasnt designed to support vst technology, almost every user in propellerhead forum was asking desperately for vst support.<br />
its quite obvious why reason users wanted that. from 2000 till now vst technology became very powerful and cutting edge technology in music industry. all reason synths and effects sound quite weak comparing to what is out today!</p>
<p>but propellerheads keep ignoring what their users want and keep adding some good or less good devises to make reason more update or appealing.</p>
<p>whats the point to add mastering suite when there are extremely good mastering effects out there with precise controls like izotopes ozone or waves ssl among many others?</p>
<p>other users need more complex delays or filters or gates or synths or guitar amps or audio recording, etc.<br />
So what is going to be? wait 10 more years to see these features as updates in reason? all these problems should have been solved by adding vst technology.</p>
<p>some they may say that you can have all these features by rewire, but composing and arranging music in 2 applications simultaneously is quite frustrating!</p>
<p>from version 3 to 4, we’ve waited more than a year to see props destroying the sequencer. this update found some supporters but many users also found the new sequencer quite frustrating and slowing down their work flow (including me). the old tested sequencer was actually the power of reason! its simplicity and directness was the power that attracted thousands of users.<br />
now that magic is gone! </p>
<p>in version 4 props added thor and thay’ve announced it as the ultimate synthesizer but it still sounds pretty weak compare to what vsti&#8217;s are out today! even though, you have to know really good programming to get rich sounds in thor.</p>
<p>so… after messing and adoring reason for 8 years i finally realize that reason is never going to be a pro music application.<br />
for hobbyists and music learning schools is an awesome program, but for pro music making still sound weak and limited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doctec</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-125501</link>
		<dc:creator>doctec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-125501</guid>
		<description>I'm one of those people who put themselves through MIDI Hell from the mid-80s to the mid-90s ... Reason works exactly the way I struggled mightily to achieve back then, and it's so much more powerful.  VSTs are nice and all (I have a bunch of the Native Instruments stuff and Ableton Live) but the workflow with them is more involved, I still find myself more often than not working in Reason because I can get my musical ideas out of my head and into my computer with relative ease without sacrificing sound design customization or audio quality.  I use the other tools &#38; like 'em, but for pure bang for the buck Reason is ahead of the pack hands down.  While I love the new Thor synth in Reason 4, I think I really appreciate the expansion of the sequencer window - it took a little getting used to, but the learning curve was not steep and it's way better to work with than earlier Reason releases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m one of those people who put themselves through MIDI Hell from the mid-80s to the mid-90s &#8230; Reason works exactly the way I struggled mightily to achieve back then, and it&#8217;s so much more powerful.  VSTs are nice and all (I have a bunch of the Native Instruments stuff and Ableton Live) but the workflow with them is more involved, I still find myself more often than not working in Reason because I can get my musical ideas out of my head and into my computer with relative ease without sacrificing sound design customization or audio quality.  I use the other tools &amp; like &#8216;em, but for pure bang for the buck Reason is ahead of the pack hands down.  While I love the new Thor synth in Reason 4, I think I really appreciate the expansion of the sequencer window - it took a little getting used to, but the learning curve was not steep and it&#8217;s way better to work with than earlier Reason releases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-125454</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-125454</guid>
		<description>For those who think it shuld do everything....

If you buy a Porsche 911 would you take it off road? No you would'nt!!

If you want .wav's to work then ReCycle will do the job, however i find it's only good for beats and not synth loops...maybe i'm doing something wrong?

I love Acid loops so i have bought Acid Pro 6 and Reason 4 to get the best of both worlds. loops in Acid and the rest from Reaon via ReWire. Both Acid and Reason are low CPU users so hopefully i shouldn't have a problem.

Can't get my head roun Live but alot of people seem to like it. Must have more of a fiddle!!

Reason is what it is and as said if you take the time to learn it properly then it will be very rewarding.

Enjoy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those who think it shuld do everything&#8230;.</p>
<p>If you buy a Porsche 911 would you take it off road? No you would&#8217;nt!!</p>
<p>If you want .wav&#8217;s to work then ReCycle will do the job, however i find it&#8217;s only good for beats and not synth loops&#8230;maybe i&#8217;m doing something wrong?</p>
<p>I love Acid loops so i have bought Acid Pro 6 and Reason 4 to get the best of both worlds. loops in Acid and the rest from Reaon via ReWire. Both Acid and Reason are low CPU users so hopefully i shouldn&#8217;t have a problem.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t get my head roun Live but alot of people seem to like it. Must have more of a fiddle!!</p>
<p>Reason is what it is and as said if you take the time to learn it properly then it will be very rewarding.</p>
<p>Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julio Helado</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-125350</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio Helado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-125350</guid>
		<description>I am always intrigued by the reason vs fl, live, etc.  debate...  It is like the Mac vs PC debate.  Whatever works for you is fine.  I just think that if you have used a software for several years, it will be hard to convince you of its shortcomings.  That is the thing.  I have been using FL Studio for about 4 years now and I love it.  I've been dabbling with reason for maybe a little over a year or so now and I do think it is a VERY powerful program.  But, to me fl does more.  Yes vsts can hog cpu.  Sooo, find which ones are doing that and don't use them.  And as far as audio goes...  I have one word...  EDISON!!!  This feature alone blows reason away.  I want to be able to do as much as I can in ONE piece of software, not have to open 3 or 4 different things just to record audio and the like.  If I had been using reason for 4 years I probably would say oh who cares about audio, or vsts, or the stupid 1/3 screen rack.  But ALL my Fl Studio beats sound like MPC joints because of the vsts that I use and yes i have to monitor them to make sure there are no cpu hogs in the mix.  Hell, there are 1000s of free vsts out there.  I rewire reason into fl if I REALLY need one of those synth sounds, but I can recreate every last one of those reason synths with My Rob Papen synths, or my morpheus, hell even the FREE Synth 1 (CLASSIC!!!)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am always intrigued by the reason vs fl, live, etc.  debate&#8230;  It is like the Mac vs PC debate.  Whatever works for you is fine.  I just think that if you have used a software for several years, it will be hard to convince you of its shortcomings.  That is the thing.  I have been using FL Studio for about 4 years now and I love it.  I&#8217;ve been dabbling with reason for maybe a little over a year or so now and I do think it is a VERY powerful program.  But, to me fl does more.  Yes vsts can hog cpu.  Sooo, find which ones are doing that and don&#8217;t use them.  And as far as audio goes&#8230;  I have one word&#8230;  EDISON!!!  This feature alone blows reason away.  I want to be able to do as much as I can in ONE piece of software, not have to open 3 or 4 different things just to record audio and the like.  If I had been using reason for 4 years I probably would say oh who cares about audio, or vsts, or the stupid 1/3 screen rack.  But ALL my Fl Studio beats sound like MPC joints because of the vsts that I use and yes i have to monitor them to make sure there are no cpu hogs in the mix.  Hell, there are 1000s of free vsts out there.  I rewire reason into fl if I REALLY need one of those synth sounds, but I can recreate every last one of those reason synths with My Rob Papen synths, or my morpheus, hell even the FREE Synth 1 (CLASSIC!!!)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reason 6</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-124575</link>
		<dc:creator>reason 6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-124575</guid>
		<description>reason 4 s good iv used the prog since version one im forced to leave reason to mix down because of 2 reasons:

1/ the dreadfull mixer display 
2/ the signalprocessing devices

the synths are fine the effect modules are fine the drum machine fine now the seqwencer is fine but the signal processing and mixer are NOT! if ne props read this please please improve these issues make the mcomp and meq the true compressor and eq they deserves to be and sort the gui out on the mixer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>reason 4 s good iv used the prog since version one im forced to leave reason to mix down because of 2 reasons:</p>
<p>1/ the dreadfull mixer display<br />
2/ the signalprocessing devices</p>
<p>the synths are fine the effect modules are fine the drum machine fine now the seqwencer is fine but the signal processing and mixer are NOT! if ne props read this please please improve these issues make the mcomp and meq the true compressor and eq they deserves to be and sort the gui out on the mixer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123892</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123892</guid>
		<description>Ableton Live Baby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ableton Live Baby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jas</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123818</link>
		<dc:creator>jas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123818</guid>
		<description>I have allways loved the ease &#38; simplicity of the Reason sequencer &#38; Cubase SX a bit fiddly, so i would do most song writing in Reason &#38; only using SX for VSTi add ons (Rewire) 
 But this new Reason 4 sequencer is well complicated. Each track is fixed to an instrument, you can't create a blank sequence track, so for example if you load a midi file of a song, each track auto creates a combinator device &#38; if you remove the combi device the sequence track deletes! rubbish.
 totaly destroying the flexibility of the original reason seqencer.
Propellorheads have made it over fussy &#38; complicated I'm gonna start sequencing Reason devices with Cubase now.

 Sounds Fantastic though, love the Devices. the gripes with sound quality is utter bunkum. i exported a pure sine wave from various music making software &#38; spectrum analysed the sound &#38; there was no difference from the orig &#38; the exported versions. just reason was quieter than the others, a 0db peak to peak normalise &#38; it was fine . just set the device to high quality export.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have allways loved the ease &amp; simplicity of the Reason sequencer &amp; Cubase SX a bit fiddly, so i would do most song writing in Reason &amp; only using SX for VSTi add ons (Rewire)<br />
 But this new Reason 4 sequencer is well complicated. Each track is fixed to an instrument, you can&#8217;t create a blank sequence track, so for example if you load a midi file of a song, each track auto creates a combinator device &amp; if you remove the combi device the sequence track deletes! rubbish.<br />
 totaly destroying the flexibility of the original reason seqencer.<br />
Propellorheads have made it over fussy &amp; complicated I&#8217;m gonna start sequencing Reason devices with Cubase now.</p>
<p> Sounds Fantastic though, love the Devices. the gripes with sound quality is utter bunkum. i exported a pure sine wave from various music making software &amp; spectrum analysed the sound &amp; there was no difference from the orig &amp; the exported versions. just reason was quieter than the others, a 0db peak to peak normalise &amp; it was fine . just set the device to high quality export.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123797</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123797</guid>
		<description>Look... everyone has their complaints about this software... the only reason for complaint is ignorance... If you want to do something in reason.. all you have to do is figure out how... You can do ANYTHING in this program.. 
Everyone is complaining about not being able to drop mp3s and wavs into reason.. thats what ReCycle is for... Never heard of it? Try it, save your edited file and open it in DrRex.. and it will shut you up... It really makes sampling a breeze...
Everyone is worried about VST compatibility.. why dont you try actually creating your own instruments and sounds in reason? There are UNLIMITED possibilities when it comes to that in reason... so many different alterations are available and effects.. the way I see it... SCREW VSTs... there is no longer a need for such a CPU draining piece of software...

All of these complaints i hear just strike me immediately as coming from lazy people that don't want to spend the time needed to figure things out... You spent time figuring out VST's and other programs... why not spend a little time figuring out an entirely different piece of software that in the end... is ALL you will ever need...

I've got tracks for days that i've made on Reason over the years... and i've spent 200 bucks on a midi controller.. now someone please tell me the downside to that? 
Since i started using Reason.. I Refuse to buy a workstation.. there is no need for one, or an MPC for that matter.. DR Rex and Recycle do it all...and then some...

And another thing lol... I don't know what the deal is with all these people complaining about the sound quality... 
Sounds to me like you can hear something wrong but just don't know the first step to take to fix it... You can COMPLETELY mix down and engineer all of your tracks WITHIN reason... What the recording studio does to it is up to them, but i can garuntee if you know what your doing, it will save the Studio engineers a LOT of time... it's saved me plenty...

To conclude...
BUY THIS SOFTWARE!!!
since we all know time = $, and if your serious about making quality music, saving time, saving money, and making it too...  You will</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look&#8230; everyone has their complaints about this software&#8230; the only reason for complaint is ignorance&#8230; If you want to do something in reason.. all you have to do is figure out how&#8230; You can do ANYTHING in this program..<br />
Everyone is complaining about not being able to drop mp3s and wavs into reason.. thats what ReCycle is for&#8230; Never heard of it? Try it, save your edited file and open it in DrRex.. and it will shut you up&#8230; It really makes sampling a breeze&#8230;<br />
Everyone is worried about VST compatibility.. why dont you try actually creating your own instruments and sounds in reason? There are UNLIMITED possibilities when it comes to that in reason&#8230; so many different alterations are available and effects.. the way I see it&#8230; SCREW VSTs&#8230; there is no longer a need for such a CPU draining piece of software&#8230;</p>
<p>All of these complaints i hear just strike me immediately as coming from lazy people that don&#8217;t want to spend the time needed to figure things out&#8230; You spent time figuring out VST&#8217;s and other programs&#8230; why not spend a little time figuring out an entirely different piece of software that in the end&#8230; is ALL you will ever need&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got tracks for days that i&#8217;ve made on Reason over the years&#8230; and i&#8217;ve spent 200 bucks on a midi controller.. now someone please tell me the downside to that?<br />
Since i started using Reason.. I Refuse to buy a workstation.. there is no need for one, or an MPC for that matter.. DR Rex and Recycle do it all&#8230;and then some&#8230;</p>
<p>And another thing lol&#8230; I don&#8217;t know what the deal is with all these people complaining about the sound quality&#8230;<br />
Sounds to me like you can hear something wrong but just don&#8217;t know the first step to take to fix it&#8230; You can COMPLETELY mix down and engineer all of your tracks WITHIN reason&#8230; What the recording studio does to it is up to them, but i can garuntee if you know what your doing, it will save the Studio engineers a LOT of time&#8230; it&#8217;s saved me plenty&#8230;</p>
<p>To conclude&#8230;<br />
BUY THIS SOFTWARE!!!<br />
since we all know time = $, and if your serious about making quality music, saving time, saving money, and making it too&#8230;  You will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franz Stary</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123641</link>
		<dc:creator>Franz Stary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123641</guid>
		<description>Nick millionVALVE is right on Par, it seems like most of us should golf to get some of this digital road-rage out of our system.

It's elegant, simple and works very well for what it's intended to do. An amazing tool which most producers should own. With that said, most producers should own a host of software. Reason wasn't intended to be everything to everyone and clever producers understand this ergo the stacks of equipment that Trevor Horn, Snoop Dogg and Timberland own.

Live it, Love it and use them all especially Reason!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick millionVALVE is right on Par, it seems like most of us should golf to get some of this digital road-rage out of our system.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s elegant, simple and works very well for what it&#8217;s intended to do. An amazing tool which most producers should own. With that said, most producers should own a host of software. Reason wasn&#8217;t intended to be everything to everyone and clever producers understand this ergo the stacks of equipment that Trevor Horn, Snoop Dogg and Timberland own.</p>
<p>Live it, Love it and use them all especially Reason!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123459</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123459</guid>
		<description>Can some one please advise me.
Can you import wav files strait into Reason 4?

And what will i need to sample my own sounds strait in to Reason 4?
ie sound card recomendations if thats what i need? i am on budget.

Thanks
Matthew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can some one please advise me.<br />
Can you import wav files strait into Reason 4?</p>
<p>And what will i need to sample my own sounds strait in to Reason 4?<br />
ie sound card recomendations if thats what i need? i am on budget.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Matthew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magus</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123440</link>
		<dc:creator>Magus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123440</guid>
		<description>millionVALVE :

If you have to reWire to other apps that DO use a lot of cpu in order to get the job done, isn't it kind of useless to make a point of how little CPU Reason uses? If it needs other applications, then by inheritance it actually IS using all of the CPU, because it is the application that is calling the others in order to work (parasite relationship, eh?). So unless your using Reason all by itself and not calling any other apps (or whatever via rewire) it is nonsensical to portray it as this all-in-one, low resource using application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>millionVALVE :</p>
<p>If you have to reWire to other apps that DO use a lot of cpu in order to get the job done, isn&#8217;t it kind of useless to make a point of how little CPU Reason uses? If it needs other applications, then by inheritance it actually IS using all of the CPU, because it is the application that is calling the others in order to work (parasite relationship, eh?). So unless your using Reason all by itself and not calling any other apps (or whatever via rewire) it is nonsensical to portray it as this all-in-one, low resource using application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squidy</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123380</link>
		<dc:creator>Squidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123380</guid>
		<description>I must admit I'm a little annoyed with it.

I went out and purchased it today, and its a great program, no doubt, but I really hate this limited screen space thing they have going on. I want to be able to use all my screen, not 1/3 of it. I want to be able to stretch it a bit and work with it that way, not have to keep scrolling etc or trying to maximise to do something else. If this version had a proper "maximise" feature I'd be over the moon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit I&#8217;m a little annoyed with it.</p>
<p>I went out and purchased it today, and its a great program, no doubt, but I really hate this limited screen space thing they have going on. I want to be able to use all my screen, not 1/3 of it. I want to be able to stretch it a bit and work with it that way, not have to keep scrolling etc or trying to maximise to do something else. If this version had a proper &#8220;maximise&#8221; feature I&#8217;d be over the moon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squidy</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123379</link>
		<dc:creator>Squidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123379</guid>
		<description>I must admit I'm a little annoyed with it.

I went out and purchased it today, and its a great program, no doubt, but I really hate this limited screen space thing they have going on. I want to be able to use all my screen, not 1/3 of it. I want to be able to stretch it a bit and work with it that way, not have to keep scrolling etc or trying to maximise to do something else. If this version had a proper "maximise" feature I'd be over the moon.

I was really hoping they sorted it out in this release :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit I&#8217;m a little annoyed with it.</p>
<p>I went out and purchased it today, and its a great program, no doubt, but I really hate this limited screen space thing they have going on. I want to be able to use all my screen, not 1/3 of it. I want to be able to stretch it a bit and work with it that way, not have to keep scrolling etc or trying to maximise to do something else. If this version had a proper &#8220;maximise&#8221; feature I&#8217;d be over the moon.</p>
<p>I was really hoping they sorted it out in this release <img src='http://www.synthtopia.com/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: millionVALVE</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123355</link>
		<dc:creator>millionVALVE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2007/06/21/propellerhead-reason-4/#comment-123355</guid>
		<description>Good heavens!

I've been using Reason--pretty much daily--since v1.0 (Feb 2001). I just bought the update and am happily discovering its power.

Some folks need to drop their illusions. I really don't care to change minds that are already made up--use what makes you happy, and please, feel quite free not to use this wonderful tool--your loss--it makes no nevermind to me.

But I'm writing this for you folks who may have never used it or are considering getting it...

--"sound engine issues": Myth. If you don't understand audio, mixing, eq, compression, effects...I really don't know what to say--other than: stick to something safe, like golf. If you can't figure out how to make your stuff sound good, no app is going to Save You. Reason sounds great. If you're buying into the "neg-meme" trope of the sound engine not sounding good, well, you're a whiny lemming, in my opinion. If you hate it, and your ears are really that offended, use something else, and go with God. (Questions for further study: what's your monitor situation? Soundcard? Listening space? Experience level? Creativity quotient? Ability to creatively problem solve?)

--VST/VSTi stuff: The Props have, since Day 1, intended Reason to be a "virtual synth studio". If you think about it like that--Lordy, it does almost everything else! If you want the whole VST experience, use ReWire--I have both Cubase SX 3 and Live 6, though I almost always use Live these days. When I want to add NI stuff (Massive, Reaktor, Absynth, Guitar Rig, Elektrik Piano, Kontakt, etc) I just ReWire it all up and go nuts. Next question...

--Audio (wav/aiff editing) support/mp3/blahblahblah: This doesn't have it. It's not supposed to. It's rock-solid, and low on CPU. If your Grandmother had balls...she'd be your Grandfather. See what I mean?

--ReCycle: I've had it almost as long as I've had Reason. Want easy to manipulate audio in Reason? Make a REX file. I do almost all my vocals that way. Once you've sliced it, it's way easier to manipulate than an audio file, anyhow.

So, kids, if you're thinking Reason is useful for what you do, go get the demo, try it--then buy it. It's a fantastic value in my (and many, many people's opinions.) If you don't like it--go buy what you think you need. I love Reason, and it changed how I made music. As I said, I almost always ReWire it to Live, and it's the basis of 90% of my tracks.

Now go play nice.

:)

Nick
millionVALVE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good heavens!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using Reason&#8211;pretty much daily&#8211;since v1.0 (Feb 2001). I just bought the update and am happily discovering its power.</p>
<p>Some folks need to drop their illusions. I really don&#8217;t care to change minds that are already made up&#8211;use what makes you happy, and please, feel quite free not to use this wonderful tool&#8211;your loss&#8211;it makes no nevermind to me.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m writing this for you folks who may have never used it or are considering getting it&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211;&#8221;sound engine issues&#8221;: Myth. If you don&#8217;t understand audio, mixing, eq, compression, effects&#8230;I really don&#8217;t know what to say&#8211;other than: stick to something safe, like golf. If you can&#8217;t figure out how to make your stuff sound good, no app is going to Save You. Reason sounds great. If you&#8217;re buying into the &#8220;neg-meme&#8221; trope of the sound engine not sounding good, well, you&#8217;re a whiny lemming, in my opinion. If you hate it, and your ears are really that offended, use something else, and go with God. (Questions for further study: what&#8217;s your monitor situation? Soundcard? Listening space? Experience level? Creativity quotient? Ability to creatively problem solve?)</p>
<p>&#8211;VST/VSTi stuff: The Props have, since Day 1, intended Reason to be a &#8220;virtual synth studio&#8221;. If you think about it like that&#8211;Lordy, it does almost everything else! If you want the whole VST experience, use ReWire&#8211;I have both Cubase SX 3 and Live 6, though I almost always use Live these days. When I want to add NI stuff (Massive, Reaktor, Absynth, Guitar Rig, Elektrik Piano, Kontakt, etc) I just ReWire it all up and go nuts. Next question&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8211;Audio (wav/aiff editing) support/mp3/blahblahblah: This doesn&#8217;t have it. It&#8217;s not supposed to. It&#8217;s rock-solid, and low on CPU. If your Grandmother had balls&#8230;she&#8217;d be your Grandfather. See what I mean?</p>
<p>&#8211;ReCycle: I&#8217;ve had it almost as long as I&#8217;ve had Reason. Want easy to manipulate audio in Reason? Make a REX file. I do almost all my vocals that way. Once you&#8217;ve sliced it, it&#8217;s way easier to manipulate than an audio file, anyhow.</p>
<p>So, kids, if you&#8217;re thinking Reason is useful for what you do, go get the demo, try it&#8211;then buy it. It&#8217;s a fantastic value in my (and many, many people&#8217;s opinions.) If you don&#8217;t like it&#8211;go buy what you think you need. I love Reason, and it changed how I made music. As I said, I almost always ReWire it to Live, and it&#8217;s the basis of 90% of my tracks.</p>
<p>Now go play nice.<br />
 <img src='http://www.synthtopia.com/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Nick<br />
millionVALVE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.311 seconds -->
