<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shure Microphone Survives Insane, Sadistic Torture Tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/12/19/shure-microphone-survives-insane-sadistic-torture-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/12/19/shure-microphone-survives-insane-sadistic-torture-tests/</link>
	<description>Synthesizer and electronic music news, synth and music software reviews and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:47:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: iplaymusicsoftly</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/12/19/shure-microphone-survives-insane-sadistic-torture-tests/#comment-131172</link>
		<dc:creator>iplaymusicsoftly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=9994#comment-131172</guid>
		<description>Funny, I had one SM58 that took a fall backwards on a stand off a stage and SNAPPED IN HALF. So much for them being so indestructable. Although I will admit it still works.
If anyone knows where you can get a reasonable replacemet body let me know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, I had one SM58 that took a fall backwards on a stand off a stage and SNAPPED IN HALF. So much for them being so indestructable. Although I will admit it still works.<br />
If anyone knows where you can get a reasonable replacemet body let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torley</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/12/19/shure-microphone-survives-insane-sadistic-torture-tests/#comment-131164</link>
		<dc:creator>Torley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 17:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=9994#comment-131164</guid>
		<description>It amazes me the SM58 is still around and selling. How very venerable! And an obvious choice for some, since they get brought up time and time again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amazes me the SM58 is still around and selling. How very venerable! And an obvious choice for some, since they get brought up time and time again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: synthhead</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/12/19/shure-microphone-survives-insane-sadistic-torture-tests/#comment-131141</link>
		<dc:creator>synthhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=9994#comment-131141</guid>
		<description>ST.B - good points. 

SM58&#039;s have earned their place much like Yamaha NS10&#039;s. They aren&#039;t the best you can get, but they are solid performers that have proved themselves over the years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ST.B &#8211; good points. </p>
<p>SM58&#8217;s have earned their place much like Yamaha NS10&#8217;s. They aren&#8217;t the best you can get, but they are solid performers that have proved themselves over the years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: St. B from DEAD PANDA</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/12/19/shure-microphone-survives-insane-sadistic-torture-tests/#comment-131137</link>
		<dc:creator>St. B from DEAD PANDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=9994#comment-131137</guid>
		<description>Of course the SM58 survived all this crap, it was designed in 1958 (true!) &amp; it has not changed one bit. It&#039;s a great mic for venues and live sound engineers because it sounds &#039;decent&#039; and it can withstand the torture that most amateur musicians will dish out onstage. This definitely shows the ruggedness of a microphone, but ruggedness should not be the chief criteria. There are other mics that are just as rugged and sound MUCH better. They cost a little bit more so most venues stick us with these antiquated 58&#039;s and 57&#039;s. I would prefer to use a mic that SOUNDS GOOD rather than the one you can bury in the yard. Too much emphasis has been placed on the 58/57&#039;s, and many live sound engineers will no (cannot) use anything else. This is very unfortunate. But there is hope, I witnessed a factory rep take a $99 vocal mic, hammer roofing nails into a 2x4 with it, then proceed to plug it in and start his seminar. The mic he used had much more clarity than a 58, and it had better feedback rejection.
The mic? SENNHEISER. Slowly but surely, Sennheiser is taking over the market, I see it everywhere. Try one out. I don&#039;t work for them, I just really dig their products. No more 58&#039;s for me, no sir.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course the SM58 survived all this crap, it was designed in 1958 (true!) &amp; it has not changed one bit. It&#8217;s a great mic for venues and live sound engineers because it sounds &#8216;decent&#8217; and it can withstand the torture that most amateur musicians will dish out onstage. This definitely shows the ruggedness of a microphone, but ruggedness should not be the chief criteria. There are other mics that are just as rugged and sound MUCH better. They cost a little bit more so most venues stick us with these antiquated 58&#8217;s and 57&#8217;s. I would prefer to use a mic that SOUNDS GOOD rather than the one you can bury in the yard. Too much emphasis has been placed on the 58/57&#8217;s, and many live sound engineers will no (cannot) use anything else. This is very unfortunate. But there is hope, I witnessed a factory rep take a $99 vocal mic, hammer roofing nails into a 2&#215;4 with it, then proceed to plug it in and start his seminar. The mic he used had much more clarity than a 58, and it had better feedback rejection.<br />
The mic? SENNHEISER. Slowly but surely, Sennheiser is taking over the market, I see it everywhere. Try one out. I don&#8217;t work for them, I just really dig their products. No more 58&#8217;s for me, no sir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
