<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roland AX-Synth &#8220;Shoulder Synthesizer&#8221; (Keytar) Now Available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/</link>
	<description>Synthesizer and electronic music news, synth and music software reviews and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:59:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dante</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/#comment-141429</link>
		<dc:creator>dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 00:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=16476#comment-141429</guid>
		<description>Roland likes to style its new gear to look like its old classic gear, even if there&#039;s no real connection, as in the Juno-G...so why didn&#039;t they make this look more like their classic Keytar, the SH-101? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roland likes to style its new gear to look like its old classic gear, even if there&#039;s no real connection, as in the Juno-G&#8230;so why didn&#039;t they make this look more like their classic Keytar, the SH-101?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dante</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/#comment-140990</link>
		<dc:creator>dante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=16476#comment-140990</guid>
		<description>Ditto the first two posts. Also it looks goofy. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto the first two posts. Also it looks goofy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam K</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/#comment-140989</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 02:04:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=16476#comment-140989</guid>
		<description>Agree 100% with wi_ngo. I would be super keen on this if it was just a controller, but I am not going to spend double for a synth I don&#039;t want. 
 
I am 100% soft-synth these days and loving it. My hardware synth doesn&#039;t get used anymore because it&#039;s just too cumbersome, limited. I use a lot of layered synths in my productions and the fact that a soft-synth has unlimited polyphony and multi-timbrality through creation of multiple instances in a project is just a total game changer that is integral to my sound and I cannot live without it. 
 
Unimpressed. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100% with wi_ngo. I would be super keen on this if it was just a controller, but I am not going to spend double for a synth I don&#039;t want. </p>
<p>I am 100% soft-synth these days and loving it. My hardware synth doesn&#039;t get used anymore because it&#039;s just too cumbersome, limited. I use a lot of layered synths in my productions and the fact that a soft-synth has unlimited polyphony and multi-timbrality through creation of multiple instances in a project is just a total game changer that is integral to my sound and I cannot live without it. </p>
<p>Unimpressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snagglepuss</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/#comment-140981</link>
		<dc:creator>snagglepuss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=16476#comment-140981</guid>
		<description>Their presets don&#039;t do their synths justice, either.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Their presets don&#039;t do their synths justice, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Findolyem</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/#comment-140970</link>
		<dc:creator>Findolyem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=16476#comment-140970</guid>
		<description>This is totally wack and off the mark imho. First off for this type of cash, how about some type of wireless MIDI type configuration? I happen to like Roland&#039;s rompler suite for certain applications, but, in a keytar? no bueno. Also aesthetically It looks super geeky in that kinda, late 90s faux contemporary way. People interested in keytars probablly want a stripped down controller to play they&#039;re vintage monosynth on stage (how about a couple of knobs??? jesus christ, roland!) with no real &#039;look&#039; one way or the other simply because synth companies usually balls it up with geeky-tron type looks as pictured here. Does it come with a clip on ponytail? cause that changes things. ;) 
 
Further, I think synth companies need to abandon this philopophy of &#039;all in one&#039; type synths that have 10,000 &#039;urban rap&#039; and &#039;techno&#039; samples. These kits insult our intelegence and are almost always laughably fruity caracatures of whatever genre they attemt to emulate. Stop talking down to us roland. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is totally wack and off the mark imho. First off for this type of cash, how about some type of wireless MIDI type configuration? I happen to like Roland&#039;s rompler suite for certain applications, but, in a keytar? no bueno. Also aesthetically It looks super geeky in that kinda, late 90s faux contemporary way. People interested in keytars probablly want a stripped down controller to play they&#039;re vintage monosynth on stage (how about a couple of knobs??? jesus christ, roland!) with no real &#039;look&#039; one way or the other simply because synth companies usually balls it up with geeky-tron type looks as pictured here. Does it come with a clip on ponytail? cause that changes things. <img src='http://www.synthtopia.com/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Further, I think synth companies need to abandon this philopophy of &#039;all in one&#039; type synths that have 10,000 &#039;urban rap&#039; and &#039;techno&#039; samples. These kits insult our intelegence and are almost always laughably fruity caracatures of whatever genre they attemt to emulate. Stop talking down to us roland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wi_ngo</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/09/01/roland-ax-synth-shoulder-synthesizer-keytar-now-available/#comment-140969</link>
		<dc:creator>wi_ngo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 23:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=16476#comment-140969</guid>
		<description>Man, I think they really missed the mark on this one.  If they would&#039;ve just made it a ~$500 midi controller, it would sell like hotcakes.  I would get one in a second. But I have no use for the Roland sound engine, especially not  for the extra $600+.  
 
I know people REALLY like the V-Synth GT (never heard it in person myself), but I&#039;ve never been a huge fan of Roland digital sound engines.  I don&#039;t claim to know anything technical about it, but &quot;SuperNATURAL&quot; sounds super cheesy.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, I think they really missed the mark on this one.  If they would&#039;ve just made it a ~$500 midi controller, it would sell like hotcakes.  I would get one in a second. But I have no use for the Roland sound engine, especially not  for the extra $600+.  </p>
<p>I know people REALLY like the V-Synth GT (never heard it in person myself), but I&#039;ve never been a huge fan of Roland digital sound engines.  I don&#039;t claim to know anything technical about it, but &quot;SuperNATURAL&quot; sounds super cheesy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
