Comments on: Sony Sound Forge Pro 10

By: drummaman

drummaman — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:46:49 +0000

I too think that there should be “more” over Pro 9.

I’ve been working with Sound Forge since Sonic Foundry’s Version 4.0 and looking at Pro 10 compared to my Pro 9, I don’t see a lot worth barking about.

There is also an issue with integration into Cakewalk’s Sonar 8.5 (x64).

Earlier versions of Sonar (x86) integrated seamlessly with Sound Forge and shuttled audio data nicely between the two.

Since Sony is now affiliated with Cakewalk, integrating Sonar and Sound Forge would leave all of the other DAW’s and editors in the dust…

Hello? Sony?
Stop pushing minimal upgrades and start thinking outside the marketing box.

By: Lost Mohawk

Lost Mohawk — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:29:14 +0000

I want a spork AND a foon …

By: rhombus

rhombus — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:35:04 +0000

lol @ sfork

By: dalebu

dalebu — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 19:30:30 +0000

Yes, Sound Forge is meant to be an audio editing tool, not a sequencer.

By: rombiculus

rombiculus — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:24:02 +0000

Good God, people!

Sound Forge isn't made to be a multitrack editor. That's not what it's for. It's like complaining that your new spoon doesn't have tines like a fork.

I guess you could go buy a sfork, but .. well, I'm not coming to eat at your house….

By: Disapointed

Disapointed — Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:12:00 +0000

Yeah it's really shame for Sound Forge……

By: Disapointed

Disapointed — Thu, 03 Sep 2009 22:05:15 +0000

Nothing really new, since version 8. Sound Forge do not deserve money anymore. Take a look at competition (Audition, Wavelab). Such shame stil only stereo editor (and yes, multichannel) but how many people need this. No multitrack editing yet. Oh my god. Maybe version 20.0 will have this