<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Analog Vs Digital: The Oberheim OB-X &amp; SonicProjects OP-X Pro Compared</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/10/05/oberheim-ob-x-vs-sonicprojects-op-x-pro/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/10/05/oberheim-ob-x-vs-sonicprojects-op-x-pro/</link>
	<description>Synthesizer and electronic music news, synth and music software reviews and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:00:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/10/05/oberheim-ob-x-vs-sonicprojects-op-x-pro/#comment-142579</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=17067#comment-142579</guid>
		<description>A masterful demo! In it&#039;s simplicity, one sees exactly what the software does, what the Oberheim can do, what they each sound like and... that&#039;s all one needs to know! I think, too, nowadays, one goes for certain classic synthesizers not because they can do everything or lots of wildly different things, but because certain peculiarities combine in a complex way to make a certain &#039;quality&#039; of sound which - sure - one can tweak all sorts of ways but as variations on a timbral theme rather than in the olden days when synthesizers could &#039;make any sound imaginable&#039;. A violin makes, erm, one sound. Yeah, right ;) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A masterful demo! In it&#039;s simplicity, one sees exactly what the software does, what the Oberheim can do, what they each sound like and&#8230; that&#039;s all one needs to know! I think, too, nowadays, one goes for certain classic synthesizers not because they can do everything or lots of wildly different things, but because certain peculiarities combine in a complex way to make a certain &#039;quality&#039; of sound which &#8211; sure &#8211; one can tweak all sorts of ways but as variations on a timbral theme rather than in the olden days when synthesizers could &#039;make any sound imaginable&#039;. A violin makes, erm, one sound. Yeah, right <img src='http://www.synthtopia.com/content/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
