<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gleetchplug Berna Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/11/06/gleetchplug-berna-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/11/06/gleetchplug-berna-review/</link>
	<description>Synthesizer and electronic music news, synth and music software reviews and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:31:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/11/06/gleetchplug-berna-review/#comment-144187</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=18209#comment-144187</guid>
		<description>Of particular interest to me - without even having learned to operate it yet - Berna clarifies my understanding of my existing DAW (Logic Studio). &#039;Traditionally&#039; the concept model for the DAW is that of the recording studio, which is populated with instruments, processors, a mixing desk and a recorder. The problem with this conceptual model - for me - is that it leaves me feeling rather exhausted, as if I had to do the jobs of several different specialists simultaneously and in real time. This corresponds to a feeling of pressure, even panic. I&#039;m also troubled by the aesthetic notion of the DAW as a sort of &#039;fake&#039; version of a &#039;real&#039; studio; a problem many others have with the concept of the synthesizer plug-in. However, seeing into the detail of Berna, I notice that the early electronic studio was, in a sense, an early synthesizer. What this allows me to do is to imagine less of &#039;now I&#039;m a composer&#039; then &#039;now I&#039;m a musician&#039; then &#039;now I&#039;m an engineer&#039; and &#039;now I&#039;m a producer&#039; and more of &#039;now I&#039;m a musician, and this DAW is my instrument&#039;. Thus, my plug-ins aren&#039;t so much independent instruments - like a violin or a piano or a keyboard synthesizer - so much as components within an instrument; as strings and soundbox and bridge are to a violin. In this sense, signal processors don&#039;t happen after the event of performing. Instead, they are an integral part of the sonic performance. As is the balance of volumes and the stereo picture. The workflow diagram isn&#039;t a one-way street but rather a spatial matrix. The sense of performance time isn&#039;t a single episode but a recursive effort much like a sculptor gradually hones away at a lump of marble or a painter gradually layers-up the composition and colour-field. In its relative simplicity and intention, the early electronic music studio allows me to think of the variables in the province of the individual and in the space of patient experiment. This is a fundamentally different approach to that of the acoustic or electric group performance &#039;caught on tape&#039;. In this, the single artist gradually shapes the layers and correspondences of an electronic data-field or, perhaps I should say, data-garden... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of particular interest to me &#8211; without even having learned to operate it yet &#8211; Berna clarifies my understanding of my existing DAW (Logic Studio). &#039;Traditionally&#039; the concept model for the DAW is that of the recording studio, which is populated with instruments, processors, a mixing desk and a recorder. The problem with this conceptual model &#8211; for me &#8211; is that it leaves me feeling rather exhausted, as if I had to do the jobs of several different specialists simultaneously and in real time. This corresponds to a feeling of pressure, even panic. I&#039;m also troubled by the aesthetic notion of the DAW as a sort of &#039;fake&#039; version of a &#039;real&#039; studio; a problem many others have with the concept of the synthesizer plug-in. However, seeing into the detail of Berna, I notice that the early electronic studio was, in a sense, an early synthesizer. What this allows me to do is to imagine less of &#039;now I&#039;m a composer&#039; then &#039;now I&#039;m a musician&#039; then &#039;now I&#039;m an engineer&#039; and &#039;now I&#039;m a producer&#039; and more of &#039;now I&#039;m a musician, and this DAW is my instrument&#039;. Thus, my plug-ins aren&#039;t so much independent instruments &#8211; like a violin or a piano or a keyboard synthesizer &#8211; so much as components within an instrument; as strings and soundbox and bridge are to a violin. In this sense, signal processors don&#039;t happen after the event of performing. Instead, they are an integral part of the sonic performance. As is the balance of volumes and the stereo picture. The workflow diagram isn&#039;t a one-way street but rather a spatial matrix. The sense of performance time isn&#039;t a single episode but a recursive effort much like a sculptor gradually hones away at a lump of marble or a painter gradually layers-up the composition and colour-field. In its relative simplicity and intention, the early electronic music studio allows me to think of the variables in the province of the individual and in the space of patient experiment. This is a fundamentally different approach to that of the acoustic or electric group performance &#039;caught on tape&#039;. In this, the single artist gradually shapes the layers and correspondences of an electronic data-field or, perhaps I should say, data-garden&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/11/06/gleetchplug-berna-review/#comment-144115</link>
		<dc:creator>Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=18209#comment-144115</guid>
		<description>Until payday I&#039;ll explore the demo version (stops after 4 minutes) and was reading the manual on the train earlier as it&#039;s not the kind of programme I can simply play around with without knowing the operational basics. But I totally love the idea of it. And the manual itself warms me to the whole enterprise, with its friendly but scholarly tone. In fact, it&#039;s in an elite group of manuals that are a pleasure to read in their own rights. Bravo!! =D </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until payday I&#039;ll explore the demo version (stops after 4 minutes) and was reading the manual on the train earlier as it&#039;s not the kind of programme I can simply play around with without knowing the operational basics. But I totally love the idea of it. And the manual itself warms me to the whole enterprise, with its friendly but scholarly tone. In fact, it&#039;s in an elite group of manuals that are a pleasure to read in their own rights. Bravo!! =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
