This video, via imageline, showcases the top 10 new features in FL Studio 9.1.
145 thoughts on “The Top 10 New Features In FL Studio 9.1”
Okay, I don't know who the hell is impersonating my username JWMMakerofMusic, but if you don't stop, I will hire a lawyer and investigator, find out who you really are, and sue you for deformation of character! DON'T impersonate me!
Okay, I don't know who the hell is impersonating my username JWMMakerofMusic, but if you don't stop, I will hire a lawyer and investigator, find out who you really are, and sue you for deformation of character! DON'T impersonate me!
Now a comment that actually pertains to the video. While I'm not particularly fond of the new F5/F6 shortcuts, I am excited about many other things like Assisted PDC, opening plugins in a very intuitive way, Edison saving to Mp3 (saves me a couple extra steps, really), Drumpad, customisable key mapping, and the best of all, Fruity Convolver!!! O_O I've been waiting for a good convolution reverb plugin to come my way, and now Gol made one. In fact, if it wasn't for Gol, we wouldn't have many of these nice new things. If you're reading this, thank you Gol.
Now a comment that actually pertains to the video. While I'm not particularly fond of the new F5/F6 shortcuts, I am excited about many other things like Assisted PDC, opening plugins in a very intuitive way, Edison saving to Mp3 (saves me a couple extra steps, really), Drumpad, customisable key mapping, and the best of all, Fruity Convolver!!! O_O I've been waiting for a good convolution reverb plugin to come my way, and now Gol made one. In fact, if it wasn't for Gol, we wouldn't have many of these nice new things. If you're reading this, thank you Gol.
Wow, this really sucks… if only ppl like that could go away. @Ex3: Cut the crap… we know its you. Even if it isn't you, it's still you. Please stop harassing IL employees, customers, and users with your identity crisis.
Wow, this really sucks… if only ppl like that could go away. @Ex3: Cut the crap… we know its you. Even if it isn't you, it's still you. Please stop harassing IL employees, customers, and users with your identity crisis.
That's more like it, see prozac does work. Too bad it's all way over due. Reaper is leaps and bounds past FL Studio. You'd be crazy to buy into that pathetic toy. Reaper + audiomidi no brainers = duh.
That's more like it, see prozac does work. Too bad it's all way over due. Reaper is leaps and bounds past FL Studio. You'd be crazy to buy into that pathetic toy. Reaper + audiomidi no brainers = duh.
Buying into FL Studio is a waste of money. 1. Lack of 64 bit. 2. 4 MB RAM Cap. 3. No Mac Version. 4. No full auto PDC. 5. Inability to control "all" mixer options via external controller. 6. Poor multi-controller functionality. 7. Poor live mode. 8. Audio editing done via 3rd party plugin. 9. Limited and time consuming audio comping. 10. Poor track rendering options. 11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is unsupported. 12. All stock and default VSTs are average to mediocre. 13. Stock samples and loops are sub par. 14. Doesn't include stock basic tools, such as de-esser, maximizer or distortion units. 15. Way overpriced after market VSTs. 16. Developers are stubborn and it takes a long time to get things improved, fixed and changed. 17. Company spends more time on after market VSTs and less time on FL Studio, providing only minimal updates, year after year. 18. Rewire setup, templates and options are time consuming. 19. FL Studio is full of workarounds and early structure and architecture that won't allow for the flexibility and control that users ask for. 20. $199 is way over priced for what you get, check out other things first.
Buying into FL Studio is a waste of money. 1. Lack of 64 bit. 2. 4 MB RAM Cap. 3. No Mac Version. 4. No full auto PDC. 5. Inability to control "all" mixer options via external controller. 6. Poor multi-controller functionality. 7. Poor live mode. 8. Audio editing done via 3rd party plugin. 9. Limited and time consuming audio comping. 10. Poor track rendering options. 11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is unsupported. 12. All stock and default VSTs are average to mediocre. 13. Stock samples and loops are sub par. 14. Doesn't include stock basic tools, such as de-esser, maximizer or distortion units. 15. Way overpriced after market VSTs. 16. Developers are stubborn and it takes a long time to get things improved, fixed and changed. 17. Company spends more time on after market VSTs and less time on FL Studio, providing only minimal updates, year after year. 18. Rewire setup, templates and options are time consuming. 19. FL Studio is full of workarounds and early structure and architecture that won't allow for the flexibility and control that users ask for. 20. $199 is way over priced for what you get, check out other things first.
To the trolls who keep posting the "waste of money" lists, while a couple of your points taken by themselves might be helpful, if that's what you were interested in being, so many of them are simply spurious as to render your "helpful" trolling useless.
1. The first thing I would take exception to is your "minimal updates" assertion, particularly since all those updates are free for life. I could post what the guys at IL have added in updates in the last 4 years, but it would take too many pages. I suggest anyone who makes that claim look at the update history here: http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/history….
2. I don't have a Mac, so I don't care
3. Skinning my DAW is definitely my top priority in music production, so you've got me there. . . .
4. Many of your complaints about track rendering, comping, and other production issues sound like look and feel problems – i.e., you like what you like, but I might not like what you like. Since FL has fully functional demos (except reloading saved projects), anyone concerned about that can try it before they buy.
5. Most of the FL VSTs are not "average to mediocre." The newer ones particularly are top notch, and overall, they are very comparable with what ships with most other DAWS that cost a couple of hundred dollars more (and yes I have couple of those). And we are getting a new convolution reverb based on Reverberate in the "minimal" update this week – which, as always, is free. As an aside re: plugins, I would point out that the FL version you are pricing also contains a fully functional internal version of Synthmaker too (no vst export). Again, try the demo.
6. Since I'm not buying the "way overpriced aftermarket VST's" how does that effect how good the DAW is, exactly? That's like saying Cubase sucks because Halion costs too much.
7. Your "flexibility and control" complaint is so nonspecific that I think a better argument might be that FL simply does not accommodate thnoodles.
8. If the "third party" audio editor (Edison) is spectacularly good, and included, who cares who developed it?
9. Clearly the developers were stubborn with you and your inanity – good for them.
To the trolls who keep posting the "waste of money" lists, while a couple of your points taken by themselves might be helpful, if that's what you were interested in being, so many of them are simply spurious as to render your "helpful" trolling useless.
1. The first thing I would take exception to is your "minimal updates" assertion, particularly since all those updates are free for life. I could post what the guys at IL have added in updates in the last 4 years, but it would take too many pages. I suggest anyone who makes that claim look at the update history here: http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/history….
2. I don't have a Mac, so I don't care
3. Skinning my DAW is definitely my top priority in music production, so you've got me there. . . .
4. Many of your complaints about track rendering, comping, and other production issues sound like look and feel problems – i.e., you like what you like, but I might not like what you like. Since FL has fully functional demos (except reloading saved projects), anyone concerned about that can try it before they buy.
5. Most of the FL VSTs are not "average to mediocre." The newer ones particularly are top notch, and overall, they are very comparable with what ships with most other DAWS that cost a couple of hundred dollars more (and yes I have couple of those). And we are getting a new convolution reverb based on Reverberate in the "minimal" update this week – which, as always, is free. As an aside re: plugins, I would point out that the FL version you are pricing also contains a fully functional internal version of Synthmaker too (no vst export). Again, try the demo.
6. Since I'm not buying the "way overpriced aftermarket VST's" how does that effect how good the DAW is, exactly? That's like saying Cubase sucks because Halion costs too much.
7. Your "flexibility and control" complaint is so nonspecific that I think a better argument might be that FL simply does not accommodate thnoodles.
8. If the "third party" audio editor (Edison) is spectacularly good, and included, who cares who developed it?
9. Clearly the developers were stubborn with you and your inanity – good for them.
Buying into FL Studio is excellent value for money. 1. 32 bit float pristine audio. 2. 4 Gb per instrument RAM available. 3. Mac Version with Bootcamp. 4. Now full auto PDC. 5. Excellent mixer control options via external controller. 6. Flexible multi-controller functionality. 7. Some excellent live mode functions. 8. Audio editing done via the integrated Edison (also made by gol). 9. Flexible and extensive audio comping. 10. Nice track rendering options. 11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is supported if you know what you are doing. 12. All stock and default VSTs are excellent. 13. Stock samples and loops are excellent. 14. Includes tools, such as maximization & distortion. 15. Some of the best value after-market VST versions. 16. Developers have a clear vision of what they want to achive and are not blown about by the latest marketing fantasy to sweep the industry. 17. Company has separate teams working on after market VSTs leaving FL Studio developers to work on FL Studio, providing great free updates, year after year. 18. Rewire setup, templates and options are a breeze. 19. FL Studio is full of flexibility and a structure that allows for the flexibility and control that users ask for. 20. $199 is way under priced for what you get, check out other things first, then buy FL Studio.
Buying into FL Studio is excellent value for money. 1. 32 bit float pristine audio. 2. 4 Gb per instrument RAM available. 3. Mac Version with Bootcamp. 4. Now full auto PDC. 5. Excellent mixer control options via external controller. 6. Flexible multi-controller functionality. 7. Some excellent live mode functions. 8. Audio editing done via the integrated Edison (also made by gol). 9. Flexible and extensive audio comping. 10. Nice track rendering options. 11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is supported if you know what you are doing. 12. All stock and default VSTs are excellent. 13. Stock samples and loops are excellent. 14. Includes tools, such as maximization & distortion. 15. Some of the best value after-market VST versions. 16. Developers have a clear vision of what they want to achive and are not blown about by the latest marketing fantasy to sweep the industry. 17. Company has separate teams working on after market VSTs leaving FL Studio developers to work on FL Studio, providing great free updates, year after year. 18. Rewire setup, templates and options are a breeze. 19. FL Studio is full of flexibility and a structure that allows for the flexibility and control that users ask for. 20. $199 is way under over priced for what you get, check out other things first, then buy FL Studio.
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and hinting towards bodily harm, wow. who ever this ex3 guy is has a very good reason to trash talk this company. seems it starts from the top and trickles down.
do your research. the limitations, instability, workarounds and "it's okay for now" will become more and more evident as time goes on. do your research, your facts are off and misleading. you should work for IL, perhaps in the mail room.
do your research. the limitations, instability, workarounds and "it's okay for now" will become more and more evident as time goes on. do your research, your facts are off and misleading. you should work for IL, perhaps in the mail room.
JWMMakerofMusic wrote: So, what would be the proper course of action to take here?
Well : I have some Xmas money I haven't spent yet … so if anyone's living in the neighborhood of Everet (WA) … _________________ Jean-Marie Cannie @ Image-Line Software – FL Studio – EZ Generator – Deckadance
JWMMakerofMusic wrote: So, what would be the proper course of action to take here?
Well : I have some Xmas money I haven't spent yet … so if anyone's living in the neighborhood of Everet (WA) … _________________ Jean-Marie Cannie @ Image-Line Software – FL Studio – EZ Generator – Deckadance
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and hinting towards bodily harm, wow. who ever this ex3 guy is has a very good reason to trash talk this company. seems it starts from the top and trickles down.
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and hinting towards bodily harm, wow. who ever this ex3 guy is has a very good reason to trash talk this company. seems it starts from the top and trickles down.
that's the mentality of the ceo of image-line. post the customer's private information and threaten them on a public forum. creepy and scary. this is the man calling the shots at image-line too.
that's the mentality of the ceo of image-line. post the customer's private information and threaten them on a public forum. creepy and scary. this is the man calling the shots at image-line too.
that's the mentality of the ceo of image-line. post the customer's private information and threaten them on a public forum. creepy and scary. this is the man calling the shots at image-line too.
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and suggesting a threat, wow.
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and suggesting a threat, wow.
FL studio 32 bit works fine with 64bit os, and I never go over like 8% cpu, have never come close to 4 gigs of ram even with 100 vsts in a track.. What would be the point of wasting time programming a 64bit fl studio. Id rather them put useful features in instead of something completely pointless
Okay, I don't know who the hell is impersonating my username JWMMakerofMusic, but if you don't stop, I will hire a lawyer and investigator, find out who you really are, and sue you for deformation of character! DON'T impersonate me!
-The real JWMMakerofMusic
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Okay, I don't know who the hell is impersonating my username JWMMakerofMusic, but if you don't stop, I will hire a lawyer and investigator, find out who you really are, and sue you for deformation of character! DON'T impersonate me!
-The real JWMMakerofMusic
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sounds like you need a hug Jim. It's good to let things out, don't keep them all bottled up with you.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Sounds like you need a hug Jim. It's good to let things out, don't keep them all bottled up with you.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Now a comment that actually pertains to the video. While I'm not particularly fond of the new F5/F6 shortcuts, I am excited about many other things like Assisted PDC, opening plugins in a very intuitive way, Edison saving to Mp3 (saves me a couple extra steps, really), Drumpad, customisable key mapping, and the best of all, Fruity Convolver!!! O_O I've been waiting for a good convolution reverb plugin to come my way, and now Gol made one. In fact, if it wasn't for Gol, we wouldn't have many of these nice new things. If you're reading this, thank you Gol.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Now a comment that actually pertains to the video. While I'm not particularly fond of the new F5/F6 shortcuts, I am excited about many other things like Assisted PDC, opening plugins in a very intuitive way, Edison saving to Mp3 (saves me a couple extra steps, really), Drumpad, customisable key mapping, and the best of all, Fruity Convolver!!! O_O I've been waiting for a good convolution reverb plugin to come my way, and now Gol made one. In fact, if it wasn't for Gol, we wouldn't have many of these nice new things. If you're reading this, thank you Gol.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wow, this really sucks… if only ppl like that could go away.
@Ex3: Cut the crap… we know its you. Even if it isn't you, it's still you. Please stop harassing IL employees, customers, and users with your identity crisis.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Wow, this really sucks… if only ppl like that could go away.
@Ex3: Cut the crap… we know its you. Even if it isn't you, it's still you. Please stop harassing IL employees, customers, and users with your identity crisis.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
I agree with wahbulance, you need a hug Jim.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
That's more like it, see prozac does work. Too bad it's all way over due. Reaper is leaps and bounds past FL Studio. You'd be crazy to buy into that pathetic toy. Reaper + audiomidi no brainers = duh.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
That's more like it, see prozac does work. Too bad it's all way over due. Reaper is leaps and bounds past FL Studio. You'd be crazy to buy into that pathetic toy. Reaper + audiomidi no brainers = duh.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's "defamation" you could probably sue for Deformation too.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's "defamation" you could probably sue for Deformation too.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Buying into FL Studio is a waste of money.
1. Lack of 64 bit.
2. 4 MB RAM Cap.
3. No Mac Version.
4. No full auto PDC.
5. Inability to control "all" mixer options via external controller.
6. Poor multi-controller functionality.
7. Poor live mode.
8. Audio editing done via 3rd party plugin.
9. Limited and time consuming audio comping.
10. Poor track rendering options.
11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is unsupported.
12. All stock and default VSTs are average to mediocre.
13. Stock samples and loops are sub par.
14. Doesn't include stock basic tools, such as de-esser, maximizer or distortion units.
15. Way overpriced after market VSTs.
16. Developers are stubborn and it takes a long time to get things improved, fixed and changed.
17. Company spends more time on after market VSTs and less time on FL Studio, providing only minimal updates, year after year.
18. Rewire setup, templates and options are time consuming.
19. FL Studio is full of workarounds and early structure and architecture that won't allow for the flexibility and control that users ask for.
20. $199 is way over priced for what you get, check out other things first.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Buying into FL Studio is a waste of money.
1. Lack of 64 bit.
2. 4 MB RAM Cap.
3. No Mac Version.
4. No full auto PDC.
5. Inability to control "all" mixer options via external controller.
6. Poor multi-controller functionality.
7. Poor live mode.
8. Audio editing done via 3rd party plugin.
9. Limited and time consuming audio comping.
10. Poor track rendering options.
11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is unsupported.
12. All stock and default VSTs are average to mediocre.
13. Stock samples and loops are sub par.
14. Doesn't include stock basic tools, such as de-esser, maximizer or distortion units.
15. Way overpriced after market VSTs.
16. Developers are stubborn and it takes a long time to get things improved, fixed and changed.
17. Company spends more time on after market VSTs and less time on FL Studio, providing only minimal updates, year after year.
18. Rewire setup, templates and options are time consuming.
19. FL Studio is full of workarounds and early structure and architecture that won't allow for the flexibility and control that users ask for.
20. $199 is way over priced for what you get, check out other things first.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
To the trolls who keep posting the "waste of money" lists, while a couple of your points taken by themselves might be helpful, if that's what you were interested in being, so many of them are simply spurious as to render your "helpful" trolling useless.
1. The first thing I would take exception to is your "minimal updates" assertion, particularly since all those updates are free for life. I could post what the guys at IL have added in updates in the last 4 years, but it would take too many pages. I suggest anyone who makes that claim look at the update history here:
http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/history….
2. I don't have a Mac, so I don't care
3. Skinning my DAW is definitely my top priority in music production, so you've got me there. . . .
4. Many of your complaints about track rendering, comping, and other production issues sound like look and feel problems – i.e., you like what you like, but I might not like what you like. Since FL has fully functional demos (except reloading saved projects), anyone concerned about that can try it before they buy.
5. Most of the FL VSTs are not "average to mediocre." The newer ones particularly are top notch, and overall, they are very comparable with what ships with most other DAWS that cost a couple of hundred dollars more (and yes I have couple of those). And we are getting a new convolution reverb based on Reverberate in the "minimal" update this week – which, as always, is free. As an aside re: plugins, I would point out that the FL version you are pricing also contains a fully functional internal version of Synthmaker too (no vst export). Again, try the demo.
6. Since I'm not buying the "way overpriced aftermarket VST's" how does that effect how good the DAW is, exactly? That's like saying Cubase sucks because Halion costs too much.
7. Your "flexibility and control" complaint is so nonspecific that I think a better argument might be that FL simply does not accommodate thnoodles.
8. If the "third party" audio editor (Edison) is spectacularly good, and included, who cares who developed it?
9. Clearly the developers were stubborn with you and your inanity – good for them.
So, in closing . . . . stick it in your ear.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
To the trolls who keep posting the "waste of money" lists, while a couple of your points taken by themselves might be helpful, if that's what you were interested in being, so many of them are simply spurious as to render your "helpful" trolling useless.
1. The first thing I would take exception to is your "minimal updates" assertion, particularly since all those updates are free for life. I could post what the guys at IL have added in updates in the last 4 years, but it would take too many pages. I suggest anyone who makes that claim look at the update history here:
http://flstudio.image-line.com/documents/history….
2. I don't have a Mac, so I don't care
3. Skinning my DAW is definitely my top priority in music production, so you've got me there. . . .
4. Many of your complaints about track rendering, comping, and other production issues sound like look and feel problems – i.e., you like what you like, but I might not like what you like. Since FL has fully functional demos (except reloading saved projects), anyone concerned about that can try it before they buy.
5. Most of the FL VSTs are not "average to mediocre." The newer ones particularly are top notch, and overall, they are very comparable with what ships with most other DAWS that cost a couple of hundred dollars more (and yes I have couple of those). And we are getting a new convolution reverb based on Reverberate in the "minimal" update this week – which, as always, is free. As an aside re: plugins, I would point out that the FL version you are pricing also contains a fully functional internal version of Synthmaker too (no vst export). Again, try the demo.
6. Since I'm not buying the "way overpriced aftermarket VST's" how does that effect how good the DAW is, exactly? That's like saying Cubase sucks because Halion costs too much.
7. Your "flexibility and control" complaint is so nonspecific that I think a better argument might be that FL simply does not accommodate thnoodles.
8. If the "third party" audio editor (Edison) is spectacularly good, and included, who cares who developed it?
9. Clearly the developers were stubborn with you and your inanity – good for them.
So, in closing . . . . stick it in your ear.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Buying into FL Studio is excellent value for money.
1. 32 bit float pristine audio.
2. 4 Gb per instrument RAM available.
3. Mac Version with Bootcamp.
4. Now full auto PDC.
5. Excellent mixer control options via external controller.
6. Flexible multi-controller functionality.
7. Some excellent live mode functions.
8. Audio editing done via the integrated Edison (also made by gol).
9. Flexible and extensive audio comping.
10. Nice track rendering options.
11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is supported if you know what you are doing.
12. All stock and default VSTs are excellent.
13. Stock samples and loops are excellent.
14. Includes tools, such as maximization & distortion.
15. Some of the best value after-market VST versions.
16. Developers have a clear vision of what they want to achive and are not blown about by the latest marketing fantasy to sweep the industry.
17. Company has separate teams working on after market VSTs leaving FL Studio developers to work on FL Studio, providing great free updates, year after year.
18. Rewire setup, templates and options are a breeze.
19. FL Studio is full of flexibility and a structure that allows for the flexibility and control that users ask for.
20. $199 is way under priced for what you get, check out other things first, then buy FL Studio.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Buying into FL Studio is excellent value for money.
1. 32 bit float pristine audio.
2. 4 Gb per instrument RAM available.
3. Mac Version with Bootcamp.
4. Now full auto PDC.
5. Excellent mixer control options via external controller.
6. Flexible multi-controller functionality.
7. Some excellent live mode functions.
8. Audio editing done via the integrated Edison (also made by gol).
9. Flexible and extensive audio comping.
10. Nice track rendering options.
11. Skinning, color and changing visual environment is supported if you know what you are doing.
12. All stock and default VSTs are excellent.
13. Stock samples and loops are excellent.
14. Includes tools, such as maximization & distortion.
15. Some of the best value after-market VST versions.
16. Developers have a clear vision of what they want to achive and are not blown about by the latest marketing fantasy to sweep the industry.
17. Company has separate teams working on after market VSTs leaving FL Studio developers to work on FL Studio, providing great free updates, year after year.
18. Rewire setup, templates and options are a breeze.
19. FL Studio is full of flexibility and a structure that allows for the flexibility and control that users ask for.
20. $199 is way under over priced for what you get, check out other things first, then buy FL Studio.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
FL Studio's limitations will only grow as technology develops. Lifetime free updates to what?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and hinting towards bodily harm, wow.
who ever this ex3 guy is has a very good reason to trash talk this company. seems it starts from the top and trickles down.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
FL studio are a pile of rotten shit, by Reason instead.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
do your research. the limitations, instability, workarounds and "it's okay for now" will become more and more evident as time goes on. do your research, your facts are off and misleading. you should work for IL, perhaps in the mail room.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
do your research. the limitations, instability, workarounds and "it's okay for now" will become more and more evident as time goes on. do your research, your facts are off and misleading. you should work for IL, perhaps in the mail room.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
smoke and mirrors. are you a republican too?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
FL Studio's limitations will only grow as technology develops. Lifetime free updates to what?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
FL Studio's limitations will only grow as technology develops. Lifetime free updates to what?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
jmc
Site Admin
Apr 15 (07:51 am)
Hmm. At least the IP he used here, on KVR & Synthopia matches his address
From GoogleMaps … it looks like a farm
_________________
Jean-Marie Cannie @ Image-Line Software – FL Studio – EZ Generator – Deckadance
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
jmc
Site Admin
Apr 15 (03:14 pm)
He got a piece of his own cake @ synthopia
_________________
Jean-Marie Cannie @ Image-Line Software – FL Studio – EZ Generator – Deckadance
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
jmc
Site Admin
Apr 15 (07:04 am)
JWMMakerofMusic wrote:
So, what would be the proper course of action to take here?
Well : I have some Xmas money I haven't spent yet … so if anyone's living in the neighborhood of Everet (WA) …
_________________
Jean-Marie Cannie @ Image-Line Software – FL Studio – EZ Generator – Deckadance
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
jmc
Site Admin
Apr 15 (07:04 am)
JWMMakerofMusic wrote:
So, what would be the proper course of action to take here?
Well : I have some Xmas money I haven't spent yet … so if anyone's living in the neighborhood of Everet (WA) …
_________________
Jean-Marie Cannie @ Image-Line Software – FL Studio – EZ Generator – Deckadance
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and hinting towards bodily harm, wow.
who ever this ex3 guy is has a very good reason to trash talk this company. seems it starts from the top and trickles down.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and hinting towards bodily harm, wow.
who ever this ex3 guy is has a very good reason to trash talk this company. seems it starts from the top and trickles down.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the mentality of the ceo of image-line. post the customer's private information and threaten them on a public forum. creepy and scary. this is the man calling the shots at image-line too.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the mentality of the ceo of image-line. post the customer's private information and threaten them on a public forum. creepy and scary. this is the man calling the shots at image-line too.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the mentality of the ceo of image-line. post the customer's private information and threaten them on a public forum. creepy and scary. this is the man calling the shots at image-line too.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and suggesting a threat, wow.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
that's the pathetic mentality of the owner, operator and decision maker at image-line? pretty scary… posting customer's information on public forums. and suggesting a threat, wow.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
posting private information of a customer then threaten them on a public forum… all this from the man calling the shots @ image-line.
good luck.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Maybe he wants to send you you flowers, for being so overly obsessive about FL.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
look i been usin flstudio since 98 or 99 it jus keeps getting better i jus seen the 9.1 tutorial and i cant wait to get it
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Are you serious? http://soundcloud.com/bassboobie/adam-dietz-drop-…
Listen to that and tell me it sounds like a toy
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Are you serious? http://soundcloud.com/bassboobie/adam-dietz-drop-…
Listen to that and tell me it sounds like a toy
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Yeah dude, sounds like you got a bad vst, you can get that in any daw…noob
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
FL studio 32 bit works fine with 64bit os, and I never go over like 8% cpu, have never come close to 4 gigs of ram even with 100 vsts in a track.. What would be the point of wasting time programming a 64bit fl studio. Id rather them put useful features in instead of something completely pointless
Like or Dislike:
0 
0