Tracktion Waveform – The Only DAW ‘Evolving At The Same Pace As Modern Music Production’

Tracktion Corporation has released Waveform, the successor to its Tracktion DAW.

The app is available in versions for Linux, Mac, Windows and even the Raspberry PI.

According to the company, ‘Waveform may be the only application evolving at the same pace as modern music production.’ 

Waveform is designed to inspire creativity, with a suite of composition tools. MIDI pattern generators let you quickly assemble musical arrangements, while built-in virtual instruments such as the FM Synth and new Collective sampler/synthesizer provide a wealth of new sounds.

Waveform is also designed to be efficient enough to support even the relatively tiny Raspberry Pi platform. This allows the app to run smoothly on almost any modern Windows, Mac or Linux computer, while also opening it up for use as an embedded solution.

Pricing and Availability:

Waveform is available now from the Tracktion website as well as retailers, with prices starting at $99 ($50 upgrade from any paid version of T5, T6, or T7).

29 thoughts on “Tracktion Waveform – The Only DAW ‘Evolving At The Same Pace As Modern Music Production’

  1. I’ve used several versions of Tracktion during the years but always turned away because of all the crashes and bugs with both Mac and PC. Judging from the KVRaudio forums, it’s not any better situation with Waveform so far…

    Thumb up 5
    1. Hey everyone! I’ve got an ingenious new model for software businesses: release updates twice as fast by halving development & test time. So what if it’s buggy, just think of the marketing opportunities!

      Like this comment?: Thumb up 2
  2. Is evolving such a good thing? The big resurgence of analog synths and sequencers over the last half decade is kinda devolving isn’t it? And I find thst a very good and enjoyable thing .. but then again I’m an old guy lol

    Like this comment?: Thumb up 3
    1. What I’d love to see is a DAW that makes devolving easier. I don’t need content, loops, or built-in virtual instruments. I need a simple and solid way to integrate hardware of various types, including modular, with the DAW. MIDI, recording, arranging, etc.

      I don’t see that solution on the horizon unfortunately. The current gen still have issue with latency, stable MIDI clock & synchronization and the same old story.

      Thumb up 28
      1. I’m just agains selling a product that makes stuff and using the stuff that your competitors product made to show off your product. they could of easily sourced a track from there evolved comity of music makers.

        Like this comment?: Thumb up 0
    1. … and quick goolge-investigation suggests that the song’s author (Zach Nicita) is an Ableton user (hint – instagram profile) ]:->

      Like this comment?: Thumb up 2
  3. The demo video doesn’t show anything particularly evolutionary, innovative or forward-thinking. It does look like a pretty typical DAW.

    In some ways, a DAW shouldn’t dictate where music is going next– and bear with me here. A DAW should be flexible enough that when an artists pushes into a new direction, the DAW won’t fight him or her. The DAW should be feature-packed and powerful enough to let new things happen, both in terms of sound and in terms of composition. This is where DAWs like MOTU DP, Samplitude, Numerology, and others really let you push into those areas.

    Like this comment?: Thumb up 2
    1. Often a new feature gets used beyond its original purpose and that makes the progression. Think ,auto tune etc

      Like this comment?: Thumb up 1
  4. I’ll stick to Live with my Push 2 (loving the workflow) and Logic Pro X (because Alchemy is the best damn soft synth on the planet).

    Like this comment?: Thumb up 1
    1. Alchemy IS ridiculous fun! It’s worth the price of Logic Pro X alone. And being to import EXS instruments is madness. 😀

      Like this comment?: Thumb up 0
  5. It’s 2017 and I’m still waiting for a DAW that has accurate MIDI timing… Until then, looks like I’ll be sticking to my Atari.

    Like this comment?: Thumb up 4
    1. And in the meantime there are thousands of people out there that are not complaining but actually making music with these DAWs without accurate MIDI timing (can you imagine?). Music that people actually buy and that ends up in the charts. I wonder what it is that these people are missing….

      Thumb up 5
      1. Being in the charts and people buying your music is but one standard for what is “good”. But your point about being able to make music with the tools you have, that’s mostly true.

        I use DP. I tried logic and hated it. Went right back to DP. I could have probably hung in there with logic but there would have been a cost. It is pretty important to choose tools that meet your needs and workflow. It’s ok to be picky about your software in the same way it is ok to be picky about the other things you buy.

        Like this comment?: Thumb up 2
      2. Perhaps these people are not so much missing something but rather know more about the technology involved: What the technical limitations of MIDI transmission and processing are and how this relates to acoustics and physiology. And they know how to work around certain things like (reproducible) latency when doing multitrack recordings. Jitter, on the other hand, is not so easy to deal with in general. But this is where knowing the limitations of human perception and also the processing in the instruments that receive the MIDI data from the computer might come in handy. Before you declare “inaccurate” timing (which is itself a rather inaccurate term to describe a bunch of phenomena that are mostly orthogonal) to be a problem, you should first check if it’s really a problem in the specific use case (instruments, interfaces, distribution scheme, musical genre, etc.). I totally agree that it’s all too easy to complain about technological limitations and sound all learned and stuff. But the important thing to remember is that a pro can create something good or even amazing with almost any setup. Being overly picky can be fun and is sometimes warranted but I feel that for many people it’s more and end in itself (looking at gear porn all day long instead of doing something with what they have).

        Like this comment?: Thumb up 2
      3. A possible solution is to go all-hardware and use the DAW just to record and edit. It also makes making music a lot more inspiring, again.

        Like this comment?: Thumb up 1
  6. I upgraded to Waveform (64-bit for on a maxed out MacBook Pro touch bar) and it crashed 5-6 times already… I guess I’ll stick to Logic

    Like this comment?: Thumb up 2
  7. Bottom line is whats most confortable for YOU to use. I still have 2 Mac SE30’s sitting in the closet, one with Opcode Vision .. the other with MOTU Performer. When I look back at my own history and discography, my best work was done on those toaster Mac’s with 80/90’s keyboards and rackmount synths. These days I like Reaper.

    Like this comment?: Thumb up 1
  8. all this just proves that the true viable platform for pc recording is mac
    check the latency figures on the internet , plus by running mac as your os,
    you dont need expensive external hardware interfaces to smooth out latency !!!!

    Like this comment?: Thumb up 0
    1. What year you posting from? Since the Oct Win 10 update, I am doing 16 tracks (mixed hardware audio tracks, Simpler, Serum, ext stereo vocal FX, with a few returns) I have all this running live with a £100 Berlinger card on a old PC laptop, with a round trip of 5.2ms – 2.6ms in and out.

      Like this comment?: Thumb up 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *