<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>Synthtopia &#187; bad music</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/tag/bad-music/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content</link>
	<description>Synthesizer and electronic music news, synth and music software reviews and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<language>en_us</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<!-- podcast_generator="podPress/8.8" -->
		<copyright>&#xA9; </copyright>
		<managingEditor>synthhead@synthtopia.com ()</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>synthhead@synthtopia.com()</webMaster>
		<category></category>
		<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
		<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
		<itunes:summary>Electronic music news, synthesizers, reviews and more!</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:author></itunes:author>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
		<itunes:owner>
			<itunes:name></itunes:name>
			<itunes:email>synthhead@synthtopia.com</itunes:email>
		</itunes:owner>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:image href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		
		<item>
		<title>Raymond Scott&#8217;s Musica Para La Intimidad</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/01/26/raymond-scotts-musica-para-la-intimidad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/01/26/raymond-scotts-musica-para-la-intimidad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>synthhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electronic Musicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collecting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic music pioneers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raymond Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strange music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=11025</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Jeff Winner of the Raymond Scott blog has a mission: to rid the world of Musica Para La Intimidad &#8211; an album that is apparently a blot on the electronic music pioneer&#8217;s name:
We have &#8220;previously warned about the dangers of a stunningly boring album recorded by Raymond Scott in 1957, and subsequently issued under three [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-11026" title="musica-para-la-intimidad" src="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/musica-para-la-intimidad.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Jeff Winner of the <a href="http://raymondscott.blogspot.com/2009/01/music-for-privacy.html">Raymond Scott blog</a> has a mission: to rid the world of <strong>Musica Para La Intimidad</strong> &#8211; an album that is apparently a blot on the electronic music pioneer&#8217;s name:</p>
<blockquote><p>We have &#8220;previously warned about the dangers of a stunningly boring album recorded by Raymond Scott in 1957, and subsequently issued under three titles in the US. It&#8217;s my duty to further caution collectors who value their time and/or ears: a fourth pressing of this dreary record was released in 1966 by the Spanish label Orlador, under the title MUSICA PARA LA INTIMIDAD.</p>
<p>I would have guessed this means &#8220;Music For Intimacy,&#8221; but according to at least one Google translator, it&#8217;s &#8220;Music For Privacy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Had RS kept the recording private, the world would be a better place. Not even a sexy chica displaying her color-coordinated pants, shoes, and upholstery can make this lackluster album worth purchasing.</p>
<p>If you see this record, run away. If you&#8217;re unfortunate enough to already own a copy (under any of its titles), please smash it with a hammer into a thousand little pieces, place the debris into a Ziploc baggie, and send it to me or Irwin; we will incinerate all copies at a public bonfire in Texas on September 9th at midnight. Location TBA. Consider this a WANTED poster.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>A recommendation like this makes the album seem nearly irresistible, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2009/01/26/raymond-scotts-musica-para-la-intimidad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scarlett Johansson Covers The Cure; It&#8217;s &#8220;Music To Slit Your Wrists To&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/07/15/scarlett-johansson-covers-the-cure/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/07/15/scarlett-johansson-covers-the-cure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>synthhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scarlett Johansson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=7421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Sorry guys &#8211; but we&#8217;re taking a break from the unrelenting onslaught of synth and electronic music news to take a look at Scarlett Johansson.
She&#8217;s got a new album out &#8211; an iTunes exclusive &#8211; that showcases her pipes. It features a take on the Cure&#8217;s Boys Don&#8217;t Cry, along with several Tom Waits covers.
Unfortunately, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7422" title="scarlett-johansson" src="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/scarlett-johansson.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Sorry guys &#8211; but we&#8217;re taking a break from the unrelenting onslaught of synth and electronic music news to take a look at <strong>Scarlett Johansson</strong>.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s got a new album out &#8211; an iTunes exclusive &#8211; that showcases her pipes. It features a take on the Cure&#8217;s <em>Boys Don&#8217;t Cry</em>, along with several Tom Waits covers.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Scarlett Johansson&#8217;s <a href="http://phobos.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?id=284825045&amp;s=143441">Live Session EP</a> is by all accounts, spectacularly terrible.</p>
<p>She may be the hottest woman in the world, but her music is, and this is a direct quote, &#8220;music to slit your wrists by&#8221;.</p>
<p>The iTunes reviews of this album are truly scathing:</p>
<ul>
<li>You would think they would have pitch correction or something, but this sounds terribly out of tune.</li>
<li>This album leaves a lot to be desired. Namely, <em>the desire to never hear her sing again</em>.</li>
<li>Why why why! Why do I have to give this 1 star. Why is there no option for zero stars?</li>
<li>Sounds like Scarlett Johansson Dead Session E.</li>
<li><em>My ears are bleeding</em>. This is ridiculously bad!</li>
<li>You would have to be deaf to buy this crap.</li>
<li>Is there a negative star rating? I haven&#8217;t heard anything this bad since Shatner covered &#8220;Lucy in the Sky&#8221;</li>
<li>This is more like groaning to poor music. Please. Make. This. Stop.</li>
<li>Sounds like the female version of a bad Hootie and the Blowfish song.</li>
<li>My ears have never bled the way they bled today. Disaster!</li>
<li>I keep waiting to hear a pack of dogs wailing in the background. This is beyond awful. Hell would be getting strapped down and forced to listen to this&#8230;</li>
<li>After hearing this, I wanted to kill myself.</li>
<li>Well, she&#8217;s pretty and a good actress.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now we know why so many actresses turn to electronic music producers to do their magic, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/07/15/scarlett-johansson-covers-the-cure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OT: The New Kids On The Block Are Really Old. And They Still Suck</title>
		<link>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/06/20/ot-the-new-kids-on-the-block-are-really-old-and-they-still-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/06/20/ot-the-new-kids-on-the-block-are-really-old-and-they-still-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>synthhead</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/?p=7100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Caught this via Lunchfood, who says: &#8220;Look, the New Kids on the Block are really old! And so are you!&#8221;
Damn! He&#8217;s right on both counts.
And if you know who the New Kids on the Block are, you&#8217;re old, too.
Thanks, Lunchfood, for ruining my day!
I think I&#8217;m going to have to skip this particular retro trend. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="512" height="323" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="flashVars" value="id=v157380834&amp;vid=2923414&amp;lang=en-us&amp;intl=us&amp;thumbUrl=http%3A//us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sch/cn/video04/2923414_rnd033a045f_19.jpg&amp;embed=1" /><param name="src" value="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?ver=2.2.4" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="512" height="323" src="http://d.yimg.com/static.video.yahoo.com/yep/YV_YEP.swf?ver=2.2.4" flashvars="id=v157380834&amp;vid=2923414&amp;lang=en-us&amp;intl=us&amp;thumbUrl=http%3A//us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/sch/cn/video04/2923414_rnd033a045f_19.jpg&amp;embed=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Caught this via <a href="http://lunchfood.tumblr.com/post/39175912/look-the-new-kids-on-the-block-are-really-old">Lunchfood</a>, who says: &#8220;Look, the New Kids on the Block are really old! And so are you!&#8221;</p>
<p>Damn! He&#8217;s right on both counts.</p>
<p>And if you know who the New Kids on the Block are, you&#8217;re old, too.</p>
<p>Thanks, Lunchfood, for ruining my day!</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;m going to have to skip this particular retro trend. I&#8217;m holding out for Mark Wahlberg to go back to being Marky Mark, with Donnie D on the backup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/06/20/ot-the-new-kids-on-the-block-are-really-old-and-they-still-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
