New Tri-Bass Touchscreen MIDI Controller

misa-tri-bass-controller

Misa – developer of the unique guitar-style Kitara MIDI controller – has retired the Kitara and introduced a new controller, the Tri-Bass.

According to Misa, the Tri-Bass “looks like a guitar, and has a name like a bass guitar, but is played like neither”. Instead, the new instrument is designed to ‘fit perfectly in a modern electronic music setting’.

Here’s a demo of the Tri-Bass in action:

Here’s what developer has to say about the Tri-Bass:

The tri-bass has been designed specifically for tomorrow’s electronic music. Although it looks like a guitar, and has a name like a bass guitar, it is played like neither. The tri-bass design is pretty far removed from traditional guitar, even more so than the original misa kitara. Partly this is to try and break any assumptions people may have of digital guitar style instruments; mostly though, it’s to make the instrument fit perfectly in a modern electronic music setting. So with that out of the way, let me break down the core elements of the design.

The neck is touch sensitive to encourage sliding along the neck. In fact, that’s what it’s all about. There are no push buttons. This is to stop the bad sound of amplitude and filter envelopes restarting, something that happens when trying to slide across an array of push buttons. When you set your synth to glide, this neck design will make sure it sounds better than anything. The fingerboard is wave shaped with channels to lock the finger to the sensor area. This is mainly to provide the tactile information a player needs about their hand position.

The tri-bass has three “strings” only – six strings are unnecessary. YES I know that’s a controversial statement to make. But after learning how other people were using the misa kitara, understanding their expectations as “digital guitarists” and most importantly seeing the workflow and processes others are currently using to produce modern electronic music, I knew it was the right decision to make. One note alone through a synthesizer can be enough to completely cut through any mix and provide enough tonal information to sound like bliss (if you’re doing it right). Do you really need six? (And this is not to sacrifice musicality, because the multi-channel nature of the instrument – see below – more than makes up for it.) Too many times people have picked up a kitara and tried to play a barre chord. It’s not really right. These sorts of six string chords are just not important for what the tri-bass is trying to achieve. The design is a reminder that the tri-bass is not meant to sound like a guitar, and it forces the user to adapt their playing style to a new electronic form. The other reason for the low string count is that three widely spaced strings allows me to do interesting things with the layout as I have more space. The result is to make playing much more comfortable and enjoyable, especially live and in dim light conditions.

The tri-bass body and neck are solid wood just as an electric guitar is. The maple neck feels really comfortable to play. This is my favourite part of the design because I think this, coupled with the embedded electronics, provide that perfect balance between traditional and futuristic forms. There is something special about combining old materials with new ones, even though it can be an engineering nightmare.

The tri-bass is a controller only and does not have an on-board synthesizer. State of the art software synthesizers are freely available to generate sound and musicians rarely limit themselves to one synth only. I want to leave the option open to the players to choose sounds based on their own taste, rather than being stuck with something provided on the hardware. Furthermore, most synthesizers are highly configurable. So my aim has been to give the tri-bass no configuration options at all, to prevent the requirement of configuration at two ends which is messy, especially when sharing presets. A minimalistic interface with configurability at the sound module end is most effective.

Perhaps the coolest element of the tri-bass is that it is multi-channel by default. The screen lets you control multiple synths or sounds simultaneously. You can mix different sounds together just by touching different parts of the screen.

In summary, I am very proud of the misa tri-bass. It is a solid, robust and stage-worthy product that has had a lot of thought go in to the design, and a lot of work go in to the engineering. I hope you like it.

The Misa Tri-Bass is priced at US $649. See the Misa site for details.

5 thoughts on “New Tri-Bass Touchscreen MIDI Controller

  1. Ok. That is pretty cool. Probably needs to be reversible for left-handed players.

    It does kind of miss the point of the guitar format that the fret-hand isn’t bending notes or having continuous strings (software fretting with bumps you can feel); but I see this being a pretty big hit and getting used by some big real-world musicians.

  2. I am going to get one. I found out about the Tri-Bass a week ago and have talked to Michael the designer/builder.
    There are definitely pluses and minuses to the design, but I see way more pluses. The key for me is to think of the Tri-Bass as a new type of instrument based on a Bass.
    I currently have a nice but older bass-to-midi convertor (Axon) and use it to play synths with my bass as a controller. I expect less latency and more unique options with the Tri-Bass.

  3. I found this part of his ‘about’ page very interesting…

    “I love all kinds of music from Pantera to Pink Floyd, but my favourite music is electronic, groups like Daft Punk, Boards of Canada, Justice and Skrillex. Basically heavy metal guitar translated to synthesizers.”

    I’m a guitarist at heart too, and have longed for a method to get superweird heavy synth sounds out the playing method that comes second nature. If the fret feel in those channels is right, than I’m totally on board.

    Also, if the creator reads this (mike?), have you considered doing a kickstarter or something to raise funds to help with production duties? It would probably be fantastic for sales to get demo units in music shops, and would probably free up more time to develop the next generation of this concept. Either way, I think I’ll be jumping in on this one.

  4. hmm.. i am thinking i might program the thing so that each of the 3 finger lanes were transposed an octave apart from each other. that would make arps a snap!

  5. The video is nice, not really my cup of tea musically but the controller seems great..
    The big problem is that it seems it can’t be configured. the finger position will send fixed cc numbers. not a problem if you use ableton live on stage but what if you want to use a synth expander? Can for instance the Nord rack 4 be programmed so CC 16 will change the filter frequency?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *