As The Terminator celebrates its 30th anniversary this year, the film continues to raise important questions. What are the risks to humanity of ascendant machine intelligence? How does a society correct the catastrophic missteps in its own past? And, most important, what the dickens is that weird time signature in the film’s score?
The other day, upon realizing that 2014 marks three decades since the film was released, I decided to stream the cautionary robot fable to see how it held up. I didn’t make it past the opening titles.
Here’s the synthtastic Terminator Theme from Brad Fiedel’s score to The Terminator:
On his site, Fiedel notes, “Terminator was very difficult because I was using many different synths and sequencers and because I didn’t have MIDI available on many of them I had to sync them by hand. This is why the main theme is in a very odd time signature. The looping of the Prophet 10 was just a little short of a complete measure.”
According to Slate’s Stevenson, the unusual time signature was a happy accident that resulted, in part, from limitations in the electronic music technology available to Fiedel in the 80s:
He first set up a rhythm loop on one of the primitive, early ’80s devices he was using. (In those days, Fiedel was firing up a Prophet-10 and an Oberheim.) He recorded samples of himself whacking a frying pan to create the clanking sounds. Then he played melodic riffs on a synthesizer over the looped beat.
Amid the throes of creation, what he hadn’t quite noticed, or hadn’t bothered to notice, was that his finger had been a split-second off when it pressed the button to establish that rhythm loop. Which meant the loop was in a profoundly herky-jerky time signature.
Fiedel’s and Stevenson’s explanations, while interesting, don’t really account for the continuing debate about the Terminator Theme. Give it a closer listen, though, and you’ll hear the theme presented two different ways:
- When it is initially introduced (at about 1:06 in the embed above), the Terminator Theme seems to be in 13/8. The beats are grouped as a 3 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 2 beat cycle.
- But the same theme is later restated (at about 3:51 in the embed above) over a driving 12/8 beat. In this second arrangement, the eighth notes are grouped as 3 + 3 + 2 + 2 + 2.
Does the fact that the theme is presented with two different rhythmic cycles explain why it’s still puzzling musicians, even after 30 years?
Give it a listen, via the embed above, and let us know what you think!